It looks like the CSV trades off number of cycles for longer run time, but under low flow a lot of that time is at fairly high head pressures?
Wouldn't having a decent size tank and putting the pressure switch ahead of the CSV Pressure regulator) be a better overall solution for constant pressure (although a bit more expensive)?
Longer run times at low flow and high back pressure cause the pump to draw lower amps and run cooler which is good for the pump. Short runs at high flow, low back pressure, and max amps are hard on the pump.
A pressure regulator after the tank does nothing for the short run times, hard starts and stops, water hammer, and other problems caused by cycling. Plus you still need an expensive and large pressure tank. You would also need a 50/70 pressure switch to maintain 50 on the discharge.
A Cycle Stop Valve on the inlet side of the tank only requires a 40/60 switch to give 50 PSI constant to the house. The CSV also allows a small tank and solves all the problems associated with cycling the pump on/off.
A pressure regulator on the discharge of the tank is exactly what the pump companies want you to do as it doesn't affect the 7 year average planned obsolescence life of the pump. A Cycle Stop Valve on the inlet side of the pump will make the pump system last 30-40 years instead, which is exactly why the pump manufacturers call it a disruptive product and will say anything to keep you from trying a CSV.
BACK PRESSRURE IS GOOD FOR A PUMP!!! CYCLING ON AND OFF IS NOT GOOD!!!!!